Interesting … because …
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the
earth. Now the earth was formless and
empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was
hovering over the waters.… And God said ‘Let there be an expanse between
the waters to separate water from water.’
So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from
the water above it. And it was so. God called the expanse ‘sky.’… And God said, ‘Let the water under the sky be
gathered into one place, and let dry ground appear.’ And it was so. God called the dry ground ‘land,’ and the
gathered waters he called ‘seas.’” (Genesis 1:1-10)
Do scientists even realize that they just supported the biblical
account of creation, minus the “billions of years ago” part? About how there was water all throughout,
before the “sky” was created, which could definitely account for evidence of ancient
water on Mars or other planets? About
how the earth was just water in the beginning, before God created the
land?
It doesn’t take a genius to see
it. And yet scientists come up with many creative,
confusing, implausible (unprovable) explanations to
explain creation ... just so they don’t have to say “God did it!” Because if they admit there is a God, then
they know they will be accountable to Him.
A reason that keeps many, many people from admitting that God is real.
(And here’s a scary thought for most people: If the Bible’s
right about the beginning, it’s right about the end too!)
Also along similar lines: